Please be ready with your application reference number starting with 'P'. For example P1234567
The information on this webpage is to be read in conjunction with this disclaimer:
Australian National Character Check (ANCC) makes every effort to provide updated and accurate information to its customers. However due to the continuously changing nature of legislations for the Commonwealth and various States and Territories, it is inevitable that some information may not be up to date. The information on the website is general information only. The contents on the website do not constitute legal or professional advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for legal or professional advice. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, suitability, accuracy or availability with respect to the information.
Based on the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT), there are some conducts that the Australian Capital Territory classifies as offensive behaviour.
Primarily, offensive behaviour is a threat to public order and, as such, falls under the category of criminal offences.
In this article, we will be going into the details regarding offensive behaviour. Consequently, this will include the definition of offensive behaviour, the penalties that it attracts, and possible defences.
But first, we would have to define some legal terms related to the crime of offensive behaviour.
If an individual is convicted for an Offensive Behaviour offence, the offence will show up as a disclosable court outcome (DCO) on a Nationally Coordinated Criminal History Check in the ACT.
According to Section 210B of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT), a public space means an unleased public land or any premises that the public can access, whether freely or through payment.
Examples of public spaces include public libraries, cultural institutions, and educational institutions. Also, this includes public hospitals, commercial vehicles, public parks, and nature reserves.
According to Section 133 of the Legislation Act 2001 (ACT), a penalty unit is a fine that the court imposes to punish a crime. The value of a single penalty unit can increase or decrease, depending on the offender's entity.
As of the year 2022, for an individual, a single penalty unit stands at $160, while for an organisation, a penalty unit amounts to $810.
According to Section 392 of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT), it is illegal for a person to disrupt public peace by conducting themself in a riotous, indecent and insulting manner.
Any individual who engages in such an act may be guilty of offensive behaviour. Based on this section of the law, offensive behaviour attracts a maximum of 20 penalty units.
In a trial for a particular crime, it is the prosecution's responsibility to prove beyond all reasonable doubt the elements of an offence. Failure to convince the court of the presence of these elements can lead to the court dismissing an allegation.
Firstly, the prosecution will have to prove that the accused intended to commit the crime for the crime of offensive behaviour, and the offender knew the effect of their action.
Furthermore, there will be a need to show the court that the defendant took certain actions which led to them committing the crime. Also, the prosecution has to convince the court that the 'intention to carry out a crime' and 'committing the crime' concurrently took place.
There are some defences that a person can raise against the charge of offensive behaviours. Some of these defences can lead to acquittal or the court giving a lesser punishment for the crime committed.
However, if a person is guilty of offensive behaviour, pleading guilty to the charge can go a long way in lessening the penalty for the crime.
Here are some of the defences an accused can raise in an offensive behaviour trial:
#1. Mental Impairment
According to Section 28 of the Criminal Code 2002 (ACT), a person may not be guilty of an offence if they were not in the right state of mind when they committed the crime.
However, for this defence to hold up in court, there must be a way of providing proof to this claim.
#2. Duress
A defendant can claim that they committed the crime of offensive behaviour due to being under threat. However, raising this defence requires the defendant to show the court that they genuinely believed the threat to be serious and their action was a reasonable response to the situation.
#3. Emergency or Necessity
To prevent great harm from happening, a person may commit an offence. In such cases, the court may dismiss the accusation of offensive behaviour as the accused acted justifiably.
Specifically, acting justifiably means any reasonable person in the defendant's position would have taken the same action to avert the danger perceived.
The jurisdiction for offences is heard in the Magistrates' Court. Summary offences in the ACT typically carry a maximum sentence of two years or less.
There are primarily two courts in the Australian Capital Territory. These are the magistrate and supreme courts.
The Supreme Court handles most indictable offences, while the Magistrate Court listens to the less serious offences, including offensive behaviour.
There are different reasons why the court gives penalties. There are times when the court gives a sentence to discourage the public from engaging in illegal activity.
Furthermore, a punishment could ensure that an offender gets the necessary help to prevent them from repeatedly committing a crime.
Additionally, a court could issue a sentence to denounce or condemn a criminal act publicly. Lastly, a sentence can serve the purpose of maintaining a just system.
Based on some factors, the court can weigh an offence to determine its gravity. The gravity of the offence will dictate how severe the penalties will be.
One of these factors is the intention of the offender. If the offender had the intention to carry out criminal activity, then the court may decide not to lessen the penalty for the crime they committed.
Another factor is the consequence of the offender's action. The consequence of the offender's action refers to how much the offender's conduct affected the victim's life.
Furthermore, the court tries to discover if the offender used a weapon when committing the crime. Consequently, the use of a weapon can make a crime more serious.
Additionally, the court can weigh the seriousness of an offence by looking at the offender's criminal record. The gravity of the offence can increase if the offender has committed a crime similar to the one for which they face charges.
The crime of offensive behaviour encompasses a wide range of misconduct. A person might be charged with the crime of offensive behaviour without having proper knowledge of the law they broke.
Based on this reason, it is advisable to seek legal aid. Consequently, this can ensure that a person gets the best result possible, including not having a criminal record.
If an individual is found guilty of an offensive behaviour offence in an ACT Court, the offence will show up as a disclosable court outcome (DCO) on the results of their Nationally Coordinated Criminal History Check.
Individuals can obtain a police check via the Australian National Character Check - ANCC® website.
Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) - https://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/1900-40
Legislation Act 2001 (ACT) - https://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/2001-14/
Criminal Code 2002 (ACT) - https://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/2002-51/
The content on this website is communicated to you on behalf of Australian National Character Check™ (ANCC®) pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act).
The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction of this material may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act.
You may include a link on your website pointing to this content for commercial, educational, governmental or personal use.
The contents of this website do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for legal or professional advice.